Vc at MIC
Kulakov, Igor
[please enable javascript to see the address]
Wed Aug 21 23:48:19 CEST 2013
Hi Matthias,
> There are failing tests for me as well, but the failures are in very special
features. Fixing those requires a lot of work. Most of the recent failures I
fixed were ICC bugs.
We see significant differences in tracking results with Vc-0.99 and Vc-0.7.2 using ICC-13.1.0. For example number of broken fast tracks (clones for ref set) is factor of 7(!) different. (see numbers below)
Meanwhile with VC_IMPL=Scalar both Vc-0.99 and Vc-0.7.2 give same result.
Do you have any suggestions how to proceed?
Regards,
Igor
Vc-0.99:
---- Global Performance 10 events Statistic ----
Track category : Eff / Clones | All Reco | All MC
Allset efficiency : 0.920 / 0.290 | 7119 | 7740
Refset efficiency : 0.982 / 0.136 | 910 | 927
Extra efficiency : 0.911 / 0.310 | 6209 | 6813
Rest efficiency : 0.898 / 0.727 | 79 | 88
Ghost probability : 0.129 | 917
All reco tracks/ev : 711.900
Reconstruction Time Real = 767.606 ms, CPU = 767.000 ms, parallelization speedup: 0.998
Vc-0.7.2:
---- Global Performance 10 events Statistic ----
Track category : Eff / Clones | All Reco | All MC
Allset efficiency : 0.944 / 0.113 | 7304 | 7740
Refset efficiency : 0.980 / 0.020 | 908 | 927
Extra efficiency : 0.939 / 0.126 | 6396 | 6813
Rest efficiency : 0.909 / 0.773 | 80 | 88
Ghost probability : 0.127 | 929
All reco tracks/ev : 730.400
Reconstruction Time Real = 146.283 ms, CPU = 145.000 ms, parallelization speedup: 0.981
________________________________________
[please enable javascript to see the address][please enable javascript to see the address][please enable javascript to see the address]]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 10:33 AM
[please enable javascript to see the address]
Subject: Re: Vc at MIC
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 20:19:52 Zyzak, Maksym wrote:
> I have compiled Vc-0.99.71 on the computer with MIC cards. And the test are
> failed. For the compilation I used icc 13.1.0.
I recommend to always update ICC to the latest version. I use ICC 13.1.2
20130514. There were some really strange miscompiles with the older compilers.
> The CPU is Intel(R) Xeon(R)
> CPU E5-2680. The log of test is given below. Can you please suggest what
> can be the problem? Should I use another version of Vc?
There are failing tests for me as well, but the failures are in very special
features. Fixing those requires a lot of work. Most of the recent failures I
fixed were ICC bugs.
--
Dipl.-Phys. Matthias Kretz
Web: http://compeng.uni-frankfurt.de/?mkretz
SIMD easy and portable: http://compeng.uni-frankfurt.de/?vc
_______________________________________________
Vc mailing list
[please enable javascript to see the address]
https://compeng.uni-frankfurt.de/mailman/listinfo/vc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://compeng.uni-frankfurt.de/pipermail/vc/attachments/20130821/995ba6bd/attachment.html>
More information about the Vc
mailing list