boost::simd
Matthias Kretz
[please enable javascript to see the address]
Tue Apr 1 11:43:10 CEST 2014
On Tuesday 01 April 2014 11:14:17 Sandro Wenzel wrote:
> A student of mine has played with them all. His conclusion was that
> boost::simd was lower in performance than Vc ( but this should be carefully
> examined ) and there might be a difference in supported platforms and
> instruction sets. I can look up the examples he studied and send them to
> you ...
That would be interesting to me as well.
--
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Dipl.-Phys. Matthias Kretz
Web: http://compeng.uni-frankfurt.de/?mkretz
SIMD easy and portable: http://compeng.uni-frankfurt.de/?vc
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://compeng.uni-frankfurt.de/pipermail/vc/attachments/20140401/e8eb9473/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Vc
mailing list